Is AI The New Cheat Sheet? Court Ruling Could Set Precedent For Student Use Of Gen-AI
As the world adapts to integrating generative AI (gen-AI) into daily life, subtle yet significant changes are unfolding in certain parts of the globe with the potential to profoundly impact people’s lives.
A recent court ruling in Boston, USA is a case in point. The ruling in a case related to a student’s alleged attempt to improve his history class grade by using an AI program in an assignment highlights the complex issue of using AI in education. While AI tools like ChatGPT offer potential benefits for students and teachers, they also present new challenges for academic integrity.
A federal judge in Boston recently rejected a request from the boy’s parents to clear their son’s disciplinary record and raise his history class grade after he was accused of using the AI program. The judge ruled that the school was justified in concluding that the student violated academic integrity rules.
The parents, on the other hand, argued that the school did not adequately inform students about the use of AI, but the judge found the school’s plagiarism policy to be sufficient. Their son testified that he was confused about the rules for using AI, which students were permitted to use for generating ideas and identifying sources.
The student had to attend detention and was initially rejected from the school’s National Honor Society, but was later admitted after reapplying. The judge described the use of AI as presenting challenges for educators and emphasized that the student and his partner copied text from the AI tool without proper review. The ruling was considered preliminary, and further development of the case is expected.
If you want to read about more such cases related to the use of AI in day-to-day life, sign up for the AI For Real Community. It’s free.
Upholding Academic Integrity in the Age of Gen-AI
US Magistrate Judge Paul Levenson who gave the ruling touched upon some fundamental points that educators the world over need to delve into.
There’s no doubt that AI can be a powerful tool for research and writing. It can help students generate ideas, conduct research, and improve their writing skills. For teachers, AI can be used to create personalized learning experiences and provide timely feedback.
However, the misuse of AI by students and even teachers can lead to plagiarism and other forms of misconduct, culminating in academic dishonesty. At the same time, education institutions, they be universities or even schools, need to put in place a policy related to the use of gen-AI for clarity.
The Larger Question in Today’s AI Age: What Constitutes Plagiarism?
When students use AI to generate entire assignments without original thought or effort, it undermines the core principles of education. It deprives students of the opportunity to develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and writing skills, which are essential for academic and professional success.
That said, the time has come to perhaps re-write the definition of plagiarism as the arrival of machine-generated content has complicated the landscape. For example, if someone, including a student, uses gen-AI content without proper attribution, does that constitute plagiarism?
This raises the question of how to define plagiarism in the age of AI. Is it plagiarism to use AI-generated text without citation, even if the student has significantly edited and revised it?
Some argue that AI-generated text is not plagiarism because it is not the work of a human author. Others say that it is plagiarism if students present the AI-generated text as their own work. The answer may depend on the specific context and the intent of the student.
Navigating the Ethical Gray Area
Certainly, the question of whether AI-generated content constitutes plagiarism is a complex one. Traditional definitions of plagiarism focus on the unauthorized use of another person’s work. However, AI tools generate content based on existing collective information, raising questions about ownership and originality.
To address these concerns, educators and institutions must develop clear guidelines for the ethical use of AI in education. These guidelines should outline acceptable uses of AI, such as using it as a research tool or a writing assistant. They should also establish penalties for misuse, such as plagiarism or cheating.
Only by carefully considering the ethical implications and developing appropriate guidelines will we be able to truly harness the power of AI to enhance learning while maintaining academic integrity.
Schools and universities need to develop clear policies on the use of AI. These policies should outline what constitutes plagiarism and what is considered acceptable use of AI. It is also important to educate students and teachers about the ethical implications of using AI.
References:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148#abstract
https://www.bitsathy.ac.in/blog/exploring-the-implications-of-ai-on-the-future-of-education-2/
https://avidopenaccess.org/resource/ai-as-a-students-personal-tutor/
https://guides.library.georgetown.edu/ai/tools#
https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/work-life/smart-ways-students-are-using-ai/
https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/usable-knowledge/23/11/better-feedback-ai
